Xylella fastidiosa in Indiana: A Growing Threat to Local Trees and Agriculture
May 23, 2025Xylella fastidiosa is a bacteria that causes serious problems in many trees and crops across the United States. It affects the water-carryin...
Xylella fastidiosa is a bacteria that causes serious problems in many trees and crops across the United States. It affects the water-carrying systems of plants, slowly making them sick and eventually killing them. While it has long been known in southern and coastal parts of the country, recent studies now show that it's spreading to the Midwest. One state where it's been showing up more often is Indiana.
This blog post gathers details from seven important research studies to show
how Xylella fastidiosa is affecting Indiana. We’ll talk about which trees are
at risk, how the disease spreads, and why it matters for the future of
Indiana’s agriculture and urban forests.
What is Xylella fastidiosa?
Xylella fastidiosa is a bacteria that lives in the xylem of plants — the
tubes that carry water. It spreads through insects like leafhoppers and
sharpshooters. When these insects feed on plants, they pick up the bacteria and
then spread it to other trees.
Infected trees start to show signs like burnt-looking leaf edges, early leaf
drop, and slow death over several years. The disease caused by this bacteria is
called Bacterial Leaf Scorch (BLS), and it’s very hard to treat or stop.
Proof of Xylella
fastidiosa in Indiana
The presence of Xylella fastidiosa in Indiana is no longer just a theory —
several studies have confirmed it:
Study |
Location |
Species Affected |
Method Used |
Impact |
Hartman
et al. (1995) |
Spencer
County, IN |
Pin
oak, Bur oak |
ELISA,
Electron Microscopy |
First
known detection in Indiana, affecting urban trees |
Bartlett
Tree Experts (2025) |
Indiana
(statewide) |
Oaks,
Sycamores, Maples |
Symptom
monitoring |
Isolated but
confirmed cases in Indiana |
Starbuck
(2010) |
Indiana,
Ohio, KY |
Oaks,
Elms, Maples |
PCR,
ELISA |
Indiana
tests positive, concern for spread in cities |
Adams
et al. (2008) |
Indiana |
Red oaks, 45
tree samples |
qPCR |
Moderate
presence, connected to warmer climate zones |
Riaz
et al. (2020) |
Not
confirmed in grapevines yet |
Grape
species |
Genetic
study |
Indiana
climate could support infection in future |
Hilton
et al. (2020) |
Indiana (wild
Carya species) |
Bitternut,
Mockernut, Sand Hickory |
PCR, ELISA |
Xylella
confirmed in native hickory species |
Nunney
et al. (2013) |
Indiana
(White Ash) |
White
ash trees |
MLST |
Discovery
of ST50 type unique to Indiana |
Let’s go deeper into what each study found.
1. Hartman et al. (1995): First Confirmation in Indiana
This study was one of the first to show that Xylella fastidiosa is in
Indiana. It found the bacteria in pin oaks in Rockport, Spencer County. This
was confirmed with ELISA and electron microscopy. They also found infected bur
oaks — a new host at the time.
Trees showed leaf scorch, browning, and slow death. The study warned that
cities could lose valuable trees if nothing is done.
Reference: Hartman, J. R., Eshenaur, B. C., & Jarlfors, U. E.
(1995). Journal of Arboriculture 21(2): 77-82.
2. Bartlett Tree Experts (2025): A Quiet Threat
This recent overview pointed out that while Xylella fastidiosa isn’t common
in Indiana yet, it has been confirmed. The disease mainly affects oak trees and
is carried by leafhoppers. The report warned that Indiana’s climate may become
more favorable to the bacteria as temperatures rise.
Reference: Bartlett Tree Experts. "Bacterial Leaf Scorch."
Accessed April 23, 2025.
3. Starbuck (2010): Urban Trees at Risk
This report confirmed that trees in Indiana tested positive for Xylella
fastidiosa. The study noted that large surveys weren’t common in the region,
but tests from Indiana showed signs of the disease.
Testing showed that trees could be infected for years without dying.
Treatments only manage symptoms — they don’t cure the tree.
Reference: Starbuck, C. J. (2010). Missouri Environment and Garden News
Article.
4. Adams et al. (2008): Survey from the North Central States
This study collected 45 tree samples from Indiana and confirmed that several
were infected. It found that warmer regions, like southern Indiana, had more
cases. The trees affected were mostly oaks.
Reference: Adams, G. C., Catal, M., Walla, J., & Gould, A. B.
(2008). U.S. Forest Service.
5. Riaz et al. (2020): A Warning for Grapevines
Though grapevines in Indiana haven’t shown major problems yet, this research
shows that Indiana’s weather and location put it at risk. The bacteria could
infect local grape species in the future, especially if resistant varieties are
not used.
Reference: Riaz, S., et al. (2020). PLOS ONE, 15(12), e0243445.
6. Hilton et al. (2020): Native Trees as Hidden Hosts
This study tested wild Carya species in Indiana and found Xylella fastidiosa
in several of them. This means that even trees without symptoms could carry and
spread the bacteria. It used qPCR and showed that these native trees could be a
silent threat.
Reference: Hilton, A., et al. (2020). European Journal of Plant
Pathology, 157(4): 899-918.
7. Nunney et al. (2013): A Unique Indiana Strain
This research showed something surprising — Indiana has its own unique type
of Xylella fastidiosa. It’s called ST50 and was found in white ash trees. This
strain is different from others and could mean that more hidden infections
exist in the region.
Reference: Nunney, L., et al. (2013). Applied and Environmental
Microbiology, 79(7): 2189–2200.
Why Indiana Should Be Concerned
Trees like red oak, pin oak, sycamore, maple, and now even hickory and ash
are at risk. These are common trees in Indiana parks, streets, and forests.
Once infected, these trees decline over time. There’s no known cure. Treatments
only reduce symptoms for a while.
The loss of these trees could:
·
Harm wildlife that depend
on them.
·
Increase heat in cities
(due to less shade).
·
Cost cities and homeowners
money to remove and replace dead trees.
What Can Be Done?
·
Early detection
is the best chance to slow the spread. Trees that look stressed in late summer
should be tested.
·
Proper tree care
like watering during dry months and avoiding damage to roots can help trees
survive longer.
·
Limit movement
of infected tree material across counties and states.
·
Monitor insect
activity, especially leafhoppers.
Final Thoughts
Xylella fastidiosa is already here in Indiana. The studies discussed provide
clear evidence that it’s spreading through native and urban trees. Some trees
may carry it without showing symptoms, making it harder to track. The discovery
of unique strains like ST50 means Indiana is not just a place where the disease
is spreading — it may also be a source of new infections.
With climate change and more trade, this disease could get worse.
Monitoring, early detection, and smart tree care are the best tools we have
right now.
References
·
Hartman, J. R., B. C.
Eshenaur, and U. E. Jarlfors. "Bacterial Leaf Scorch Caused by Xylella
fastidiosa: A Kentucky Survey; A Unique Pathogen; and Bur Oak, A New
Host." Journal of Arboriculture 21, no. 2 (March 1995): 77-82.
·
Bartlett Tree Experts.
"Bacterial Leaf Scorch." Accessed April 23, 2025. https://www.bartlett.com/tree-advice-and-resources/type/tree-diseases.
·
Starbuck, Christopher J.
"Bacterial Leaf Scorch in the Midwest and Plains States." Missouri
Environment and Garden News Article, University of Missouri, January 1,
2010.
·
Adams, G. C., Catal, M.,
Walla, J., & Gould, A. B. "Bacterial Leaf Scorch: Distribution and
Isothermal Lines." U.S. Forest Service, North Central and Plains
States, 2008.
·
Riaz, S., Tenscher, A. C.,
Heinitz, C. C., Huerta-Acosta, K. G., & Walker, M. A. "Genetic
Analysis Reveals an East-West Divide Within North American Vitis Species That
Mirrors Their Resistance to Pierce’s Disease." PLOS ONE 15, no.
12 (2020): e0243445.
·
Hilton, A., et al.
"Improved Methods for Detecting Xylella fastidiosa in Pecan and Related
Carya Species." European Journal of Plant Pathology 157, no. 4
(2020): 899-918.
·
Nunney, L., et al.
"Recent Evolutionary Radiation and Host Plant Specialization in the
Xylella fastidiosa Subspecies Native to the United States." Applied
and Environmental Microbiology 79, no. 7 (April 2013): 2189–2200.